Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
Hi Giorgio,
hm, I think it may be possible to make a NURBS version of the plug-in, the only problem I see is that NURBS-CVs are never on the surface since they always build something like a hull around it, that means the collision wouldn't look accurate and there would still be some kind of intersections if you deform the CVs....
I'm not sure if it's worth implementing it for NURBS when you can't get exact deformations.
Or am I wrong concerning this CV/Surface offset thing?
All the best,
Jan
I'd like to see NURBS implemented, then I could use it in my facial rigs to drive other components.
The accuracy of the collision isn't so important as the overall effect, nice work though!
Cheers,
Andy
Giorgio Lafratta
Comments on this feature request:
Jan Lachauer said almost 14 years ago:
andyLP said over 13 years ago: